Revision 30a5c527
Von Sven Schöling vor mehr als 8 Jahren hinzugefügt
| SL/PriceSource.pm | ||
|---|---|---|
|
A possible solution is to either split price sources into simple and complex
|
||
|
ones (where the former do not require records).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Another would be to have default values for the inpout normally taken from
|
||
|
Another would be to have default values for the input normally taken from
|
||
|
records (like qty defaulting to 1).
|
||
|
|
||
|
A last one would be to provide an alternative input channel for needed
|
||
| ... | ... | |
|
=item *
|
||
|
|
||
|
Discount sources were implemented as a copy of the prices with slightly
|
||
|
different semantics. Need to do a real design. A requirement is, that a sinle
|
||
|
different semantics. Need to do a real design. A requirement is, that a single
|
||
|
source can provide both prices and discounts (needed for price_rules).
|
||
|
|
||
|
=item *
|
||
| ... | ... | |
|
=item *
|
||
|
|
||
|
Composing price sources is disallowed for clarity, but all price sources need
|
||
|
to be aware of units. This is madness.
|
||
|
to be aware of units and price_factors. This is madness.
|
||
|
|
||
|
=item *
|
||
|
|
||
|
A common complaint is that prices from certain vendors are always negotiated
|
||
|
and should use a default value but must be editable (like free prices) by
|
||
|
default. This should be orthogonal for all prices.
|
||
|
|
||
|
=item *
|
||
|
|
||
|
The current implementation of lastcost is useless. Since it's one of the
|
||
|
master_data prices it will always compete with listprice. But in real scenarios
|
||
|
the listprice tends to go up, while lastcost stays the same, so lastcost
|
||
|
usually wins. Lastcost could be lower priority, but a better design would be
|
||
|
nice.
|
||
|
|
||
|
=back
|
||
|
|
||
Auch abrufbar als: Unified diff
PriceSource: doku update
Mehrere Anforderungen die sich über die Zeit gesammelt haben