Projekt

Allgemein

Profil

« Zurück | Weiter » 

Revision 2d43271a

Von Moritz Bunkus vor etwa 8 Jahren hinzugefügt

  • ID 2d43271a0953982d4798e6101bb13d7f8cc56e4b
  • Vorgänger 232f9a39
  • Nachfolger e5a76ed1

SL::DB::with_transaction: bessere Doku zu den zwei Hauptunterschieden

Unterschiede anzeigen:

SL/DB.pm
159 159
=item C<with_transaction $code_ref, @args>
160 160

  
161 161
Executes C<$code_ref> with parameters C<@args> within a transaction,
162
starting one if none is currently active. Example:
162
starting one only if none is currently active. Example:
163 163

  
164 164
  return $self->db->with_transaction(sub {
165 165
    # do stuff with $self
166 166
  });
167 167

  
168
One big difference to L<Rose::DB/do_transaction> is the return code
169
handling. If a transaction is already active then C<with_transaction>
170
simply returns the result of calling C<$code_ref> as-is.
168
There are two big differences between C<with_transaction> and
169
L<Rose::DB/do_transaction>: the handling of an already-running
170
transaction and the handling of return values.
171 171

  
172
Otherwise the return value depends on the result of the underlying
173
transaction. If the transaction fails then C<undef> is returned in
174
scalar context and an empty list in list context. If the transaction
175
succeeds then the return value of C<$code_ref> is returned preserving
172
The first difference revolves around when a transaction is started and
173
committed/rolled back. Rose's C<do_transaction> will always start one,
174
then execute the code reference and commit afterwards (or roll back if
175
an exception occurs).
176

  
177
This prevents the caller from combining several pieces of code using
178
C<do_transaction> reliably as results committed by an inner
179
transaction will be permanent even if the outer transaction is rolled
180
back.
181

  
182
Therefore our C<with_transaction> works differently: it will only
183
start a transaction if no transaction is currently active on the
184
database connection.
185

  
186
The second big difference to L<Rose::DB/do_transaction> is the
187
handling of returned values. Basically our C<with_transaction> will
188
return the values that the code reference C<$code_ref> returns (or
189
C<undef> if the transaction was rolled back). Rose's C<do_transaction>
190
on the other hand will only return a value signaling the transaction's
191
status.
192

  
193
In more detail:
194

  
195
=over 2
196

  
197
=item * If a transaction is already active then C<with_transaction>
198
will simply return the result of calling C<$code_ref> as-is preserving
176 199
context.
177 200

  
201
=item * If no transaction is started then C<$code_ref> will be wrapped
202
in one. C<with_transaction>'s return value depends on the result of
203
that transaction. If the it succeeds then the return value of
204
C<$code_ref> will be returned preserving context. Otherwise C<undef>
205
will be returned in scalar context and an empty list in list context.
206

  
207
=back
208

  
178 209
So if you want to differentiate between "transaction failed" and
179 210
"succeeded" then your C<$code_ref> should never return C<undef>
180 211
itself.

Auch abrufbar als: Unified diff